Part 3: Your Legal Toolkit: Defending Against Restrictive Covenants

Restrictive covenants in your contract can feel like a barrier to building your independent practice, but they’re not always as ironclad as they seem. With a clear understanding of your rights and the tools to defend your position, you can navigate these challenges confidently.

What Are Restrictive Covenants?

Restrictive covenants are clauses in a contract that limit your actions after leaving an employer. They’re designed to protect the employer’s business interests but must be fair, reasonable, and enforceable under UK law.

The most common restrictive covenants include:

• Non-Compete Clauses: Prohibiting you from working within a certain geographic area or market.
• Non-Solicitation Clauses: Preventing you from approaching former clients or colleagues.
• Confidentiality Clauses: Restricting the use of proprietary information or business methods.

For these restrictions to hold up in court, they must protect legitimate business interests and not unfairly prevent you from earning a living.

Building Your Defense

Here’s how to construct a strong defense against claims of contract breaches:

1. Client Choice Matters

Clients have the right to choose their provider, especially in health and wellness industries, where relationships are deeply personal. Highlighting client autonomy is one of the strongest defenses against restrictive covenants.

Key Actions:

• Gather written statements from clients confirming that they independently chose to continue working with you.
• Save communications where clients initiated contact.
• Emphasize the unique value you bring to client care, such as specialized expertise or established relationships.

2. Demonstrate Geographic Separation

Courts are unlikely to enforce restrictions if your new practice operates in a different area or serves a distinct market. This shows you’re respecting boundaries and not directly competing with your former employer.

Key Actions:

• Provide maps showing the distance between your new and former practice locations.
• Highlight any significant differences in your client base or services.

3. Highlight Continuity of Care

For practitioners in health and wellness, continuity of care is essential to client outcomes. Courts often prioritize the public interest in maintaining these therapeutic relationships over restrictive covenants.

Key Actions:

• Document the importance of uninterrupted care for your clients’ progress.
• Reference professional guidelines or ethical obligations that support continuity of care.

4. Prove Reasonableness

Restrictive covenants must be reasonable in scope and duration to be enforceable. For example, a 12-month non-compete clause covering an entire city may be seen as excessive.

Key Actions:

• Compare your contract’s restrictions to industry norms.
• Argue against overly broad or vague terms that unreasonably limit your ability to work.

5. Show No Significant Business Harm

Your former employer must prove that your actions caused measurable harm to their business. If you’ve taken steps to avoid direct competition, this argument becomes difficult to sustain.

Key Actions:

• Document how your new practice operates independently (e.g., different marketing strategies, new clients).
• Demonstrate that any losses incurred by your former employer were likely due to natural attrition.

Preparing Your Evidence

Strong evidence is your best ally in defending against restrictive covenants. Here’s what to gather:

• Client Communications: Messages showing clients initiated contact or testimonials about why they chose you.
• Practice Details: Maps, business addresses, and other documents proving geographic separation.
• Timeline of Events: A clear record of when you left, started your new practice, and gained clients.
• Marketing Records: Proof that you’ve marketed your services independently without targeting your former employer’s clients.
• Client Progress Reports: Evidence of the need for continuity of care, such as treatment plans or progress notes.

How Courts View Restrictive Covenants

UK courts balance the enforceability of restrictive covenants against the rights of the individual to work and the public’s interest in accessing services. Here’s what they consider:

• Reasonableness: Are the restrictions fair and proportionate?
• Legitimate Business Interest: Does the employer have a genuine need for protection, such as safeguarding trade secrets or client lists?
• Public Good: Will enforcing the covenant harm clients or the public, such as by disrupting access to essential health and wellness services?

If the court finds the restrictions unreasonable or harmful, they may declare the covenant unenforceable.

Summary: Key Defenses at a Glance

• Client Choice: Clients independently chose to follow you.
• Geographic Separation: Your new practice is distinct and non-competitive.
• Continuity of Care: Client wellbeing depends on ongoing treatment.
• Reasonableness: Restrictions are excessive or disproportionate.
• No Harm: Your actions have not significantly impacted your former employer’s business.

The Bigger Picture

Defending against restrictive covenants is about more than just legal arguments—it’s about protecting your career, your clients, and your professional integrity. By staying calm, gathering evidence, and seeking legal advice when necessary, you can move forward confidently and build a thriving practice on your terms.

Looking for more advice? Practical Tips for a Seamless Transition to Your New Practice.

‍